This is the transcript for the November 2022 edition of the Google SEO Office Hours . For site-specific help, we recommend posting your question in the Google Search Central Help Community .<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Lizzi : Abhishek is asking, \u201cCan we use multiple values in one schema markup field using comma separation? For example, GTIN equals value one, value two\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Well, as always, you should check the documentation for the particular feature because some of the guidance might differ from feature to feature. But in general, it\u2019s a good markup practice to specify one value per field. In the case of GTIN, there should only really be one value, since this is a unique product identifier. If you\u2019re specifying a GTIN and ISBN, then use the GTIN, and then the ISBN property, so that we know which value applies to which property.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
John : Pierre asks: \u201cThe disavow feature in Search Console is currently unavailable for domain properties. What are the options then?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Well, if you have domain level verification in place, you can verify the prefix level without needing any additional tokens. Verify that host and do what you need to do. Also, keep in mind that disavowing random links that look weird or that some tool has flagged, is not a good use of your time. It changes nothing. Use the disavow tool for situations where you actually paid for links and can\u2019t get them removed afterwards.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Duy : Hello, this is Duy recording for SEO Office Hours. Latha asked, \u201cHow bad is the helpful content update for sites accepting guest posts for money?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Our systems can identify sites with low value, low quality content, or content created just for search engines. Sites accepting guest posts for money without carefully vetting content and links risk ranking lowering service results, not just because of the helpful content update, but also because of the other systems that we already put in place.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
So taking a step back, canonicalization is based on more than only the link rel=”canonical” element. When Google discovers URLs that are significantly alike, our systems try to pick one URL that best represents the content. For that we take into account not only the link rel=”canonical” , but also redirects, sitemaps, internal links, external links, and more. If you have strong feelings about which URL should be used, then make sure that all of your signals align. Keep in mind that canonicalization is mostly about which URL is shown. It\u2019s not something that affects the ranking of the content.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Gary : \u201cIf a site has a directory covering on each topic, which isn\u2019t searched for very often, is Google more likely to crawl and index the pages if the content is short, and so it\u2019s cheaper to store it in the index.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
This is an interesting question. The length of the content doesn\u2019t influence how often we crawl and whether we index it. It also doesn\u2019t contribute to the crawl rate of a URL pattern. Niche content can also be indexed. It\u2019s not in any way penalized, but generally content, that\u2019s popular on the internet, for example, many people linked to it, gets crawled and indexed easier.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Alan : Paul asked, \u201cCould dynamic sorting of listings be the reason for not indexing product images?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
It is unlikely that dynamic sorting of listings would be the reason for product images not being indexed. Your product images should be referenced from your product description pages, so we know the product the image is for. If needed, you can create a sitemap file or provide a Google Merchant Center feed so Google can find all your product pages without depending upon your listings page.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Lizzi : Sergey is asking, \u201cIs there a timeframe for the site migration? We\u2019re migrating a large site to a new domain at the moment. After four months, there is still no signs of the new domain getting SERP positions of the old one. So what should we do?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
With a big change like this, it\u2019s totally normal to see ranking fluctuations, especially while you\u2019re still in the middle of the migration. There\u2019s no set timeframe for when things will settle down, and also keep in mind that only moving one section of your site is not necessarily indicative of a whole site move when it comes to Search. If you\u2019re still moving things around, you\u2019re going to continue to see fluctuations. It\u2019s hard to say what you should do next without seeing the site itself. And for site specific help, we definitely recommend posting in the forums so people can see your specific situation and give more specific advice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
John : Flavio asks, \u201cCould the use of HTTP\/3, even indirectly, improve SEO, perhaps because it improves performance?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Google doesn\u2019t use HTTP\/3 as a factor in ranking at the moment. As far as I know, we don\u2019t use it in crawling either. In terms of performance, I suspect the gains users see from using HTTP\/3 would not be enough to significantly affect the core web vitals, which are the metrics that we use in the page experience ranking factor. While making a faster server is always a good idea, I doubt you\u2019d see a direct connection with SEO only from using HTTP\/3. Similar to how you\u2019d be hard pressed to finding a direct connection to using a faster kind of RAM in your servers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Duy : Andrea asked, \u201cWhy does Google keep using backlinks as a ranking factor if link building campaigns are not allowed? Why can\u2019t Google find other ranking factors that can\u2019t be easily manipulated like backlinks?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
There are several things to unpack here. First, backlinks as a signal has a lot less significant impact compared to when Google Search first started out many years ago. We have robust ranking signals, hundreds of them, to make sure that we are able to rank the most relevant and useful results for all queries. Second, full link building campaigns, which are essentially link spam according to our spam policy. We have many algorithms capable of detecting unnatural links at scale and nullify them. This means that spammers or SEOs spending money on links truly have no way of knowing if the money they spent on link building is actually worth it or not, since it\u2019s really likely that they\u2019re just wasting money building all these spammy links and they were already nullified by our systems as soon as we see them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
John : Sam asks, \u201cdoes it matter if the vast majority of anchors for internal content links are the same?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Well, This is fine. It\u2019s normal even. When it comes to menus, they\u2019re usually everywhere, and even products when they\u2019re linked within an e-commerce site, they\u2019re usually linked with the same link all the time. That\u2019s perfectly fine. There\u2019s nothing that you really need to do there in terms of SEO.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Lizzi : Anonymous is asking, \u201cIf you add the latest website schema to your home page, do you still add software application or organization schema too? Google updated its schema markup of documentation by adding website schema for brand, but it does not mention what happens with organization or software application schema.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Well, it really depends. Sorry to give that answer. These are different features. If your site is about a software application, then sure, you can also add software application structured data. Just make sure that you nest everything so that there\u2019s one website node on the home page and not multiple website nodes. That\u2019s really the key with this thing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Gary : Chris is asking, \u201cHow much of an issue for Google is excessive number of noindex pages, and whether it will affect discovery and indexing of content if the volume is too high?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Good question. noindex is a very powerful tool search engines support to help you, the site owner keep content out of their indexes. For this reason, it doesn\u2019t carry any unintended effects when it comes to crawling and indexing. For example, having many pages with noindex will not influence how Google crawls and indexes your site.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Alan : Yasser asked if the URL doesn\u2019t contain characters of the same language used in the pages, would that affect a site ranking?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
From an SEO point of view, there\u2019s no negative effect, if the URL is in a different language than the page content. Users on the other hand, may care, especially if they share the URL with other people.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Duy : Kristen asked, \u201cHow should content creators respond to sites that use AI to plagiarize the content, modify it, and then outrank them in search results?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Scraping content, even with some modification, is against our spam policy. We have many algorithms to go after such behaviors and demote site scraping content from other sites. If you come across sites that repeatedly scrape content, that perform well on Search, please feel free to report them to us, with our spam report form so that we can further improve our systems, both in detecting the spam and also ranking overall.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Lizzi : Ridwan is asking, \u201cIs it true that Google rotates indexed pages? Because the site I\u2019m working on is rotating on indexed pages. Like for example, page A is indexed on Monday through Thursday, but not indexed Friday through Sunday.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Okay. So the answer is real quick. No, this is not true. We are not rotating the index based off of days of the week.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
John : Anton asks, \u201cShould we keep an eye on the ratio between indexed and non-indexed pages in Search Console in order to better recognize possibly wasted crawl budget on non-indexed pages?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
No, there is no magic ratio to watch out for. Also, for a site that\u2019s not gigantic, with less than a million pages, perhaps, you really don\u2019t need to worry about the crawl budget of your website. It\u2019s fine to remove unnecessary internal links , but for small to medium sized sites, that\u2019s more of a site hygiene topic than an SEO one.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
You do not need to take any action to make your content enabled for Discover. We do that automatically. Google, however uses different criteria to decide whether to show your content and Discover versus search results. So getting traffic from search is not a guarantee that you\u2019ll get traffic from Discover.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Gary : Sam is asking another noindex related question: \u201cA lot of SEOs are complaining about having millions of URLs flagged as excluded by noindex in Google Search Console. All to nonsense internal search pages linked from spammy sites. Is this a problem for crawl budget?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
noindex is there to help you keep things out of the index, and it doesn\u2019t come with unintended negative effects as we said previously. If you want to ensure that those pages or their URLs more specifically don\u2019t end up in Google\u2019s index, continue using noindex and don\u2019t worry about crawl budget.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Lizzi : Lalindra is asking: \u201cWould it be considered thin content if an article covering a lengthy topic was broken down into smaller articles and interlinked?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Well, it\u2019s hard to know without looking at that content. But word count alone is not indicative of thin content. These are two perfectly legitimate approaches: it can be good to have a thorough article that deeply explores a topic, and it can be equally just as good to break it up into easier to understand topics. It really depends on the topic and the content on that page, and you know your audience best. So I would focus on what\u2019s most helpful to your users and that you\u2019re providing sufficient value on each page for whatever the topic might be.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Gary : Michelle is asking: \u201cHTTPS reports help center documentation says lots of 404 pages can prompt Google to stop crawling and processing URLs. How much is a lot of 404s? And can having lots of linked 404s in a website affect this?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Well, this is awkward. Thank you for this question. We fixed a typo in our documentation that initially suggested that 404 HTTP status codes cause crawling to stop on site level. It should have been HTTPS certificate errors instead of 404 errors. Feel free to have as many 404 errors as you need on your site. They don\u2019t affect crawling of your website overall. 404 pages are a very healthy part of the internet.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Alan : Iman asked, \u201cWhat is the current state of Key Moments video markup? It seems like this snippet is only available for YouTube videos. Is that the case?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Key Moments video mark up is live and used by a range of video providers. It is not specific to YouTube. If our online documentation is not sufficient, try reaching out into public forums.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
John : A user called \u201cWeird All website\u201d asks, my new website, \u201cWeird All\u201d, is not showing up in searches when I type in the full name of the website. It confuses the term with the name of the singer \u201cWeird Al\u201d .<\/p>\n\n\n\n
As someone who has grown up listening to lots of Weird Al music, I totally sympathize with Google and with other search engines. For the most part, if people are going to type in \u201cweird all\u201d with two L\u2019s, probably they meant to reach Weird Al instead. Essentially, when it comes to SEO for these kind of things, it\u2019s important that you pick a site name that is not just a typo of something that\u2019s really well known, because you\u2019re going to have a really hard time differentiating yourself from there. If something looks like a typo to our systems, we will try to treat it as a typo and we will try to guide people to what they\u2019re probably looking for. And this is something that our systems can work out over time as we see that well actually people really want to go to \u201cweird all\u201d and not hear from \u201cWeird Al\u201d but this takes a lot of time and especially when you\u2019re talking about someone as established as Weird Al , you\u2019re going to really have a hard time differentiating yourself in that regard.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Lizzi : Anonymous is asking, \u201cIs it possible to get FAQ featured snippets with just pure HTML? As simple HTML as possible, not referring to schema markup.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Okay. So if you\u2019re talking about the FAQ rich result, right now, you need FAQ schema markup to be eligible for that enhancement in search results. Some features may be able to automatically pick up what you\u2019re putting out on your webpage, but really you should check the specific documentation to be sure if that\u2019s even a possibility. But for FAQ rich result, you definitely need the markup.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
John : Esben asks, \u201cRegarding self-referring canonicals: my idea is that they provide a uniqueness signal for deduplication, but I see conflicting views. What do you think John?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Well, from my point of view, they do nothing. But sometimes pages get seen under other URLs, and then suddenly the canonical is no longer self-referential and actually useful. For example, if a page is sometimes referred to with UTM tracking parameters.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Alan : A question received was, \u201cIt seems to me that the search engines promote strong sites more and more and lowers weak resources more and more. Don\u2019t you think there should be some percentage of randomness?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Duy : Kunal asked why Google is not taking action on copy or spun web stories? Can you check on Discover?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Thank you for the report. We are aware of these attempts and we are looking into them. In general, sites with spammy scraped content violate our spam policy, and our algorithms do a pretty good job of demoting them in search results.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
John : Tom asks, \u201cDo moderated blog comment pages internally linked as link rel=”ugc” get deindexed?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
No they don\u2019t. Pages can get indexed for a variety of reasons. While a link with a rel=”ugc” is treated differently, as is, for example, a link with the rel nofollow , this doesn\u2019t negatively affect the destination page. If you want to prevent a page from being indexed, then make sure to use the noindex robots meta tag instead.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Alan : Abdul Rahim asked, how does Google evaluate product reviews update for non-physical products that don\u2019t have affiliate links?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Our focus is on physical products that can be purchased, but our system also at times evaluates content involved for digital products. If you are reviewing a product, it is not required you provide an affiliate link. It\u2019s a best practice to include useful links to other resources that may also be helpful to the reader.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Lizzi : Siddiq is asking, \u201cI have 10,000 plus pages on my site. Writing meta tags will take a long time for all of them. Any shortcuts?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Well, our docs on meta descriptions have guidance on this. It can be a good idea for some sites to programmatically generate the meta description, particularly larger database driven sites like product aggregators. However, make sure that whatever you\u2019re generating is still good quality. The descriptions should still be unique, specific, and relevant to each page. Don\u2019t use the same meta descriptions over and over again.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
John : \u201cI\u2019m looking at purging perhaps 10,000 pages of thin blog content. Is there a best practice for that?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Well, delete the pages. There\u2019s nothing special that you need to do. Deleting thin pages also doesn\u2019t automatically make your site more valuable, though. You really have to make sure that the value exists independent of the thin or the remove pages.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Duy : \u201cI\u2019m new to SEO and I see many websites or videos suggest that I should buy backlinks. Are backlinks as powerful or should I focus on maximizing quality of my site?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
There are always people seeking shortcuts or tricks to manipulate, search, ranking, or spend money to make their sites appear more authoritative to search engines. Link spam is an example of these tricks. We no longer use links predominantly compared to 20 years ago, for example. And also launched many algorithms to nullify links spam, and you probably should not waste your money in spamming links. That money is much needed in creating a great website with great user experience and helpful content.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
No. It doesn\u2019t need to have a cached page. The caching system is a bit independent of search\u2019s indexing and ranking. It\u2019s not a signal or a hint of quality if a page does not have a cached page.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Alan : Esben Rasmussen asked, \u201cHow can Google Search Console report an unknown internal URL as the referring URL for 400 series error URLs?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The URL may be unknown because Google does not index every page. The crawler may have come across a page, but if it was not indexed, we\u2019d report it as unknown.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Gary : Yusuf is asking, \u201cIn a WordPress website or blog, should we mark as nofollow automatically created pages such abc.com\/page\/one , and page\/two , and so on.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
If you want to restrict crawling or indexing of certain types of pages on your site, it\u2019s probably a better idea to use robots.txt disallow rules than no-following URLs pointing to those pages. If nothing else, it\u2019s much less work. Presumably, but it\u2019s also less brittle. You can\u2019t control how people link to your pages after all, so some links might end up being air-quotes follow.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
John : Bobby asks, is anything being done to improve the metric shown in Search Console? In particular, the Performance report sometimes looks confusing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
This is actually normal. We recently published a blog post on this topic on the Search Central blog approximately called a deep dive into the performance data . There\u2019s a difference when you look by query and by page, and there\u2019s some amount of privacy filtering that happens in the per query data. Often the details are less critical since trends tend to be the same, but we have a lot of documentation on that if you want to go down the rabbit hole.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Lizzi : Michal is asking: \u201cHow do I prevent pay-walled content from appearing in search results and Discover for non-paying users? I have implemented the paywalled content markup properly, and I\u2019m worried about unsatisfied users.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Well, that is what we recommend. Tell us what content is behind the paywall with paywall structure data. So you\u2019re on the right track there. If you really want to prevent the paywall content from appearing in Search entirely, then you can choose to noindex those pages. But that\u2019s really up to you.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
John : Usama asks, \u201cDoes the spam score affect my site\u2019s ranking? Is there a way to improve the spam score for any website, perhaps outside of disavowing links?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
So, top secret, or maybe not so top secret, but Google does not use third party SEO tools to determine scores for individual pages. So if you have a tool that flags a spam score for your website, keep in mind that Google doesn\u2019t use it. That doesn\u2019t mean that this tool is not useful. It just means Google doesn\u2019t use that score. So my recommendation would be to try to understand what this tool is trying to tell you, and if there\u2019s something actionable behind that, then go and do that.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Alan : Vara Praad asked, \u201cOnce a product is sold out and it will never be return in stock, what should we do for that product page? Should we delete the product page or redirect to a specific page?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
From a Search perspective, it is fine to delete the page. From a site usability perspective, you might like to keep the page up for a while or do a redirect in case the old page was referenced from a third party blog or bookmarked by a customer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
John : Tomas asks, if hreflang is used, but they\u2019re missing return tags, will hreflang still be considered for those tags, or will those errors have an effect across the website?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
When we look at hreflang, we take into account any valid hreflang annotations. And when it comes to broken ones, for example, ones that don\u2019t have a link back to those individual pages, then we will drop just that connection. So if you have one page that has three working hreflang annotations and one broken one. We will just ignore that one broken one because we can\u2019t figure out how it works, but we will continue to use the others that you have specified on that page. And since hreflang is a per page annotation, if you\u2019re doing this across your website and you have some that work and some that don\u2019t work, we will take into account the ones that work and we will just ignore the ones that don\u2019t work. There\u2019s no negative effect from the ones that don\u2019t work other than that, they don\u2019t do hreflang. That said, if you\u2019re testing your site and you find these kinds of broken annotations, my recommendation is still to fix them, just so that you take that one worry out. And whenever you notice issues like this, often there are simple things that you can do to just fix that. I would try to fix that, but it\u2019s not going to have a negative effect on the other annotations that you have across your site.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Gary : Damian is asking, \u201cHow do you suggest a website can implement hreflang when there is no control over brand sites in many countries?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Fantastic question, and hreflang is an important and complicated topic. Implementing hreflang among many variations of a site can be quite challenging indeed. However, there\u2019s an easy way to control all the hreflang from a single location: sitemaps. Search for \u201csitemap cross submits\u201d on sitemaps.org to learn how to set it up, and then add the hreflang to your sitemaps instead of your HTML pages. This can simplify the process quite a bit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Yes. There\u2019s nothing special about hreflang sitemaps. These are traditional sitemap files with additional hreflang annotations included in them. You can position them on your site like any other sitemap file. You can use the robots.txt file to submit them and they can be located anywhere. If you use Search Console to submit them, you can locate them anywhere within your verified sites. The same idea applies to sitemaps with image or video annotations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
I would first check Google Search Console to see if there are any errors blocking us from crawling your site. But Google doesn\u2019t index everything on the web, so you really need to make sure your content stands out in terms of quality.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
John : Amy asks, \u201cI have a site in 13 languages. As authors leave, the articles are dropped with new language updates. The client gives us two options: either drop the x-default or use the last translated language as the x-default . Which is better?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
This is totally up to you. You can specify languages on a per page- set basis. It doesn\u2019t have to be the same across the whole website. It\u2019s fine to have English be the default language once and maybe Japanese to be the default another time, if you think that\u2019s what users find valuable. Keep in mind that x-default means that users who are not searching in one of these specified languages would see that page. So I would focus this more on what would be useful for users and less on your internal processes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
If you\u2019re seeing broad impact across your site, it\u2019s probably not due to your product reviews. It may be some other update that have occurred.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Gary : Anonymous is asking, \u201cWhat\u2019s the best way to remove old content and stop it from being indexed? Redirect? If so, what\u2019s the best page to redirect to?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Interesting question. You can either delete altogether a page and serve a 404 or 410 status code for its location when you want to retire the page. Or redirect it to another page that will still help the user in some way accomplish their goal. It\u2019s really up to you how and what you do. Ultimately, it has to make sense for you, not search engines.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Lizzi : Sean B is asking, \u201cDoes text in images influence ranking in Image Search, for example, Image Search for T-shirt printing? I\u2019m not concerned with the text on the t-shirt within the image, rather the text around the image that might include features such as the price, the product name, the brand URL, that kind of thing.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Well, Sean, the text around the image is certainly helpful when it comes to understanding the image. Google can extract info around the image, like from the captions and image titles, so definitely make sure the image is near relevant text and that that text is descriptive.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Alan : Akshay Kumar Sharma asked, is it beneficial for the local businesses to list their local business details in many free or paid local listing websites? Does Google consider them for their local query results?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Don\u2019t look at adding your site to reputable local listing sites as a way to improve your SEO. Use them as a possible way to get more traffic, unrelated to Search. Local Search is different.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
John : Alfonso asks, \u201cIs a query parameter added to a site URL, like for example, \u201cadd to cart\u201d. Is that bad for SEO?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
No, it\u2019s not necessarily bad for SEO on its own. However, for very large websites, it can play a role in terms of crawl budget if you\u2019re unnecessarily adding query parameters to your URLs. And this is something where you have to take a judgment call for your website and think about, \u201cis this actually a really large website?\u201d. And with these extra parameters that you\u2019re adding within your website\u2019s internal linking, are you causing the number of URLs that could be found to explode exponentially? And if that\u2019s the case, then I would work to try to reduce the number of parameters that you\u2019re adding to URLs. But if you\u2019re talking about a smaller to medium sized website, then probably those parameters are something that you can look at later on when you become a gigantic website.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Website Performance Research Page load speed is the first thing you notice when you visit a we ..<\/p>\n\n\n\n
What Is a Value Proposition and How to Write One What Is a Value Proposition? A value propositi ..<\/p>\n\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
This is the transcript for the November 2022 edition of the Google SEO Office Hours . For site-specific help, we recommend posting your question in the Google Search Central Help Community . Can we use multiple values in one schema markup field using comma separation? Lizzi : Abhishek is asking, \u201cCan we use multiple values […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-31234","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/alienroad.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31234","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/alienroad.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/alienroad.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alienroad.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=31234"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/alienroad.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31234\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":31510,"href":"https:\/\/alienroad.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31234\/revisions\/31510"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/alienroad.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31234"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alienroad.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=31234"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alienroad.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=31234"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}