\n positive and constructive<\/a>
\n —and we’re
\n not the only ones<\/a>.
\n Effective search engine optimization can make a site more crawlable and make individual pages
\n more accessible and easier to find. Search engine optimization includes things as simple as
\n keyword research to ensure that the right words are on the page, not just industry jargon that
\n normal people will never type.\n<\/p>\n
\n Ethical search engine optimization, also known as “white hat SEO”, often improves the usability
\n of a site, helps create great content, or makes sites faster, which is good for both users and
\n search engines. Good search engine optimization can also mean good marketing: thinking about
\n creative ways to make a site more compelling, which can help with search engines as well as
\n social media. The net result of making a great site is often greater awareness of that site on
\n the web, which can translate into more people linking to or visiting a site.\n<\/p>\n
\n The opposite of ethical SEO is something called “black hat webspam”, or simply webspam (we say \n The goal of many of our ranking changes is to help searchers find sites that provide a great \n In the next few days, we’re launching an important algorithm change targeted at webspam. The \n Here’s an example of a webspam tactic like keyword stuffing taken from a site that will be \n Of course, most sites affected by this change aren’t so blatant. Here’s an example of a site \n Sites affected by this change might not be easily recognizable as spamming without deep \n The change will go live for all languages at the same time. For context, the initial Panda \n We want people doing ethical search engine optimization (or even no search engine optimization
\n “webspam” to distinguish it from email spam). In the pursuit of higher rankings or traffic, a
\n few sites use techniques that don’t benefit users, where the intent is to look for shortcuts
\n or loopholes that would rank pages higher than they deserve to be ranked. We see all sorts of
\n webspam techniques every day, from
\n keyword stuffing<\/a> to
\n link schemes<\/a> that attempt to
\n propel sites higher in rankings.\n<\/p>\n
\n user experience and fulfill their information needs. We also want the people making great
\n sites for users, not just algorithms, to see their effort rewarded. To that end we’ve launched
\n Panda changes<\/a>
\n that successfully
\n returned higher-quality sites in search results<\/a>.
\n And earlier this year we launched a
\n page layout algorithm<\/a>
\n that reduces rankings for sites that don’t make much content available “above the fold.”\n<\/p>\n
\n change will decrease rankings for sites that we believe are violating Google’s existing
\n quality guidelines<\/a>.
\n We’ve always targeted webspam in our rankings, and this algorithm represents another
\n improvement in our efforts to reduce webspam and promote high quality content. While we can’t
\n divulge specific signals because we don’t want to give people a way to game our search results
\n and worsen the experience for users, our advice for webmasters is to focus on
\n creating high quality sites<\/a>
\n that create a good user experience and employ ethical SEO methods instead of engaging in
\n aggressive webspam tactics.\n<\/p>\n
\n affected by this change:\n<\/p>\n![\"Page](\"https:\/\/alienroad.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/kb-gorsel\/g-98b163c420b1.png\")
<\/p>\n
\n with unusual linking patterns that is also affected by this change. Notice that if you try to
\n read the text aloud you’ll discover that the outgoing links are completely unrelated to the
\n actual content, and in fact the page text has been “spun” beyond recognition:\n<\/p>\n![\"Page](\"https:\/\/alienroad.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/kb-gorsel\/g-7d8a6c362b28.png\")
<\/p>\n
\n analysis or expertise, but the common thread is that these sites are doing much more than
\n ethical SEO; we believe they are engaging in webspam tactics to manipulate search engine
\n rankings.\n<\/p>\n
\n change affected about 12% of queries to a significant degree; this algorithm affects about
\n 3.1% of queries in English to a degree that a regular user might notice. The change affects
\n roughly 3% of queries in languages such as German, Chinese, and Arabic, but the impact is
\n higher in more heavily-spammed languages. For example, 5% of Polish queries change to a degree
\n that a regular user might notice.\n<\/p>\n
\n at all) so they can focus on creating amazing, compelling web sites. As always, we’ll keep
\n our ears open for feedback on ways to iterate and improve our ranking algorithms toward that
\n goal.\n<\/p>\n